• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Topics
    • All
    • Branding/Logos
    • Copywriting
    • Design Profession
    • Design Palettes
    • Ephemera
    • Technology
    • Illustration
    • Links
    • Marketing PR
    • Photography
    • Print Design
    • Typography
    • Web Design
  • Links
    • Illustration
    • Marketing & Public Relations
    • Photography
    • Print Design
    • Reference
    • Typography
    • Web Design
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Search
new mastercard logo

Branding/Logos

It’s the most talked about two circle logo in world history

by Chuck Green at ideabook.com

The latest revision of the Mastercard logo has taken the graphic design world by storm. Everyone has an opinion, but this time, it seems just about everyone likes this logo makeover.

Michael Bierut and his Pentagram team had the rare opportunity to simplify simple and took it. They stripped the existing logo down to the essentials—basic, flat shapes, the already iconic colors, and straight-forward, lower case, sans serif type.

As Lynda.com author John McWade tweeted: “MasterCard logo redesign is killer. Simple. Familiar. Attractive. INSTANT identification. THAT’S WHAT A MARK IS FOR.”

From the AIGA: Pentagram’s Michael Bierut Geeks Out Over the Color Theory Behind the New Mastercard Logo…

From Brand New: Coming Full Circle(s)…

From Co.Design: MasterCard Gets Its First New Logo In 20 Years…

Next
Previous

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen Martin >

    October 9, 2017 at 1:31 am

    We have entered a world where creativity and imagination have gone by the wayside. In today’s world, anyone can call themselves a graphic designer, and this is a perfect example.

    I’m not saying that these good folks are not graphic designers, but certainly, this “revised” logo demonstrates my point.

    So sad…

    Reply
    • Rob Royall >

      October 9, 2017 at 2:04 pm

      @Stephen Martin, you seem to either have a pretty narrow view of “creativity and imagination”. We also live in a world of over-the-top showy spectacle, so oftentimes simplicity is a creative solution. Plus, you fail to acknowledge whether or not this updated design actually delivers for its client, and I’d love to hear how you think it hasn’t.

      In this case, the logo simplification really only works because it is an established brand, with a mark that is recognized worldwide even when broken down to its basic elements. If just “anyone” threw together a couple of colored circles as a logo for a startup company, with no obvious connection to what that company’s mission is, it wouldn’t get lauded in the least. Sure they can call themselves a graphic designer, but they’ll win no awards for it and you don’t have to hire them.

      Reply
  2. Dan Antonelli >

    October 9, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    Whats more surprising is that you’d be able to TM that.

    Reply
  3. Stephen Martin >

    October 11, 2017 at 12:38 am

    The client accepted the end product, so I did not think it necessary to speak to whether or not the design delivers. That is obvious. And I never said it didn’t work. I said it was unimaginative and lacked in creativity. I believe the simplicity of the design speaks to why I think that way.

    You seem to believe I have a narrow view of “imagination and creativity.” I can live with that.

    Reply

Thoughts? Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

sidebar

Ideabook.com

  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Topics
  • Links
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Search

Join Chuck Green and ideabook.com on
Facebook | Google+ | LinkedIn | Pinterest | Twitter